Report: U.S. Pushes Russian Gas Transit Through Ukraine Despite EU Phaseout Law Breaking News · Russia–Ukraine War · U.S. Foreign Policy · Energy · Democratic Accountability By Kirk Ramsey, IIII DINA Co-Editor Democracy Independent News Association (DINA) Published: 2026-10-10 Original: https://www.dinanews247.press/articles/trump-calls-replace-zelenskyy-russian-diesel-october-10 The reported U.S. plan could use an American intermediary and escrow Russian proceeds as leverage for an energy ceasefire. Reuters could not verify the report, and no government has published an agreement. Breaking news · Russia–Ukraine war · U.S. foreign policy · Energy · Democratic accountability · DINA analysis LATEST UPDATE — November 2, 2026, 12:34 a.m. ET: The Wall Street Journal reports that U.S. envoys are promoting a plan to restart Russian natural-gas sales to Europe through Ukraine as leverage for an energy ceasefire. The newspaper, citing unnamed U.S., European and Ukrainian officials, says the proposal could use a U.S. intermediary and place Russian proceeds in escrow in a third-country jurisdiction. Reuters said it could not immediately verify the report. DINA found no matching public White House, State Department or Ukrainian announcement and no published agreement, sanctions authorization, intermediary identity or escrow terms. The reported discussions are therefore evidence of a proposal under consideration—not confirmation that the United States has adopted it, Ukraine has accepted it, Europe has authorized it or Russia has agreed to a ceasefire. The plan also faces a documented legal and political barrier. The European Commission said October 28 that binding REPowerEU legislation is already phasing Russian gas and liquefied-natural-gas imports out of the European market, with final shipments due to end by late 2027. The Commission said the rule is not contingent on sanctions or other geopolitical events and stressed that Europe has learned the costs of dependence on Russian fossil fuels. What this changes: the proposal adds a possible gas-transit incentive, reported U.S. commercial participation and an escrow concept to Washington's continuing effort to secure an energy ceasefire. It does not resolve the central problem documented in this article: there are still no published common terms, monitoring rules or enforcement measures, and the reported commercial structure would have to be reconciled with EU law. DINA analysis: Any peace incentive involving Russian gas must be tested against two risks: restoring Moscow's leverage over European energy and creating private profit before Russia makes a verifiable concession. The immediate accountability questions are who would own or control the U.S. intermediary, who would serve as escrow trustee, what conduct would release funds, what sanctions or EU-law exceptions would be invoked and what automatic consequence would follow a violation. LATEST UPDATE — October 14, 2026, 4:23 a.m. ET: Russia's overnight missile-and-drone attack killed three people in Kyiv, damaged 30 energy facilities and left at least 600,000 people without electricity, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said. The expanded assessment replaces the preliminary one-death account previously reported here. Ukraine reported intercepting only four of 39 incoming missiles. That figure is a Ukrainian military assessment; DINA has not independently verified the launch count, interception count or every impact site. The reported rate underscores an acute air-defense vulnerability but does not establish why each missile was not intercepted. Russia's Defense Ministry said its forces struck four power plants in and around Kyiv and two in Kharkiv, among other targets. That statement confirms Russia claims responsibility for attacks on power infrastructure, but it does not independently verify Moscow's characterization of the sites, weapons or military purpose. Prime Minister Sergii Koretskyi said state railway facilities were also targeted in five Ukrainian regions. Zelenskyy described the attack as deliberate disrespect for President Donald Trump's peace effort. His characterization is political judgment; the confirmed accountability issue is that Trump announced an energy ceasefire without published matching assent from Russia and Ukraine, while Russia now acknowledges striking multiple power plants. What this changes: the overnight episode is no longer a preliminary report of one death and limited damage. The confirmed scale—three deaths in Kyiv, 30 damaged energy facilities and at least 600,000 people without power—materially weakens any claim that an operative, monitored energy ceasefire is protecting civilian infrastructure. LATEST UPDATE — October 14, 2026, 12:45 a.m. ET: A new Russian strike on Kyiv killed one person, injured another and hit energy facilities, Mayor Vitali Klitschko said early Wednesday. Reuters witnesses heard explosions as Ukraine's air force warned that Russian missiles and drones were attacking multiple regions. Klitschko said falling debris struck both residential and nonresidential buildings and that a fire broke out in one structure. The casualty count and full damage assessment remain preliminary. DINA has not independently verified the impact sites, munition types, intended targets or casualty total. The attack follows Ukraine's statement that it had paused strikes on Russian oil refineries and one day in which Russia reported no Ukrainian energy target among its attacks. It does not by itself resolve whether Moscow intentionally observed, accepted or violated any common rule: Russia and Ukraine still have not published matching ceasefire terms, a start time, a monitor or an enforcement process. What this changes: the claimed energy pause can no longer be assessed only from a single quieter day. A reported strike on energy facilities brings the central unanswered questions—what sites are covered, who attributes an attack and what consequence follows—back into immediate focus. LATEST UPDATE — October 13, 2026, 3:37 p.m. ET: Twelve U.S. senators—six Republicans and six Democrats—urged President Donald Trump to rescind the Russian-diesel arrangement and revoke Treasury General License 135, according to a letter reviewed by Reuters. The signers include North Carolina Republican Thom Tillis, Senate Republican figures Mitch McConnell and John Cornyn, and six Democratic senators. The senators alleged that the authorization damages U.S. security interests, benefits Moscow and will not materially help Americans. Those are congressional policy and legal claims, not a court ruling. The Office of Foreign Assets Control license confirms that transactions involving the sale, delivery, offloading and importation of Russian-origin diesel—including importation into the United States—are authorized through 12:01 a.m. EDT on April 7, 2027, subject to a restriction on debits to specified Russian state accounts. Trump separately said the United States continues sharing intelligence with Ukraine. Asked whether Russia could use diesel proceeds to buy more bombs, he said the fuel was being released to the world rather than to the United States, but did not answer the financing question. No public record reviewed by DINA shows that Russia made a reciprocal military concession for the license. What this changes: opposition has expanded from seven senators to a 12-member bipartisan group that includes six Republicans, and the dispute now targets a specific operative instrument—General License 135. The letter does not itself revoke the license, block transactions or establish that the administration violated the 2022 import ban. LATEST UPDATE — October 13, 2026, 7:14 a.m. ET: No Russian strike on a Ukrainian energy target was reported Tuesday for the first time since President Donald Trump's weekend claim of an “energy ceasefire,” while Ukraine said it had paused attacks on Russian oil refineries for two days. Russia's Defense Ministry did not list any energy facility in its daily strike report, although a missile landed slightly more than a kilometer from a major heating plant in Lviv. Reuters said it was unclear whether Russia deliberately avoided energy infrastructure. The Kremlin said contacts were continuing but still did not publicly acknowledge accepting Trump's ceasefire. The wider war did not stop. Ukrainian officials said Russian ballistic missiles and drones struck transport, logistics, residential and medical sites, killing four people in Kharkiv and injuring at least 11 there. Ukraine's air force said it received no advance surveillance warning before six ballistic missiles were fired at Kyiv, while Foreign Minister Andrii Sybiha said U.S. intelligence sharing continues. DINA has not independently verified every impact site, casualty or warning record. What this establishes: Tuesday provides the first observable one-day pause in reported Russian energy-target strikes and a Ukrainian statement of restraint. It does not establish a bilateral ceasefire, intentional Russian compliance or agreed terms. LATEST UPDATE — October 12, 2026, 10:34 p.m. ET: President Donald Trump said Russia and Ukraine agreed to his proposed energy ceasefire because he told them they agreed, even though neither government has publicly released matching assent or common terms. Speaking to reporters before traveling to Ohio, Trump also alleged that there had been violations “on both sides” but supplied no incidents, intelligence, dates or attribution evidence. Ukraine says it refrained from refinery attacks overnight while Russia struck at least six Ukrainian energy sites. The Kremlin says contacts are continuing but has not publicly accepted the ceasefire Trump declared. Trump's statement is confirmation of his own approach—not confirmation that Russia and Ukraine reached a bilateral agreement. The public record still lacks signed terms, matching announcements, a start time, monitoring rules or an enforcement mechanism. LATEST UPDATE — October 12, 2026, 10:02 p.m. ET: Gen. Alexus Grynkewich, the top U.S. and NATO military commander in Europe, was among the American officials who asked Ukraine to stop attacking Russian oil refineries, according to a Ukrainian security adviser and a Western official who spoke anonymously to The Washington Post. The two sources said Ukrainian officials interpreted references to U.S.-supplied weapons and intelligence as a warning that continued refinery strikes could endanger support. The Ukrainian adviser also said the Americans described the message as a request between partners rather than a threat. No written order, aid condition or suspension has been released, and NATO told the newspaper that support through the Prioritized Ukraine Requirements List continues. Separately, Grynkewich publicly told the Warsaw Security Forum that NATO is prepared to defeat an attack while saying conflict is neither imminent nor inevitable. The Associated Press reported that he called for a coordinated response to Russian activity and more support for Ukraine. His public defense posture is on the record; the account of his private request to Kyiv remains anonymous-source reporting. LATEST UPDATE — October 12, 2026, 7:18 p.m. ET: U.S. envoys told Ukrainian officials that the Russian-diesel arrangement was intended to help draw Moscow back into peace negotiations even though President Vladimir Putin was not prepared to negotiate an end to the war, according to three people familiar with a Friday meeting who spoke to Reuters. Reuters reported that Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner presented the diesel access as a signal that Washington was willing to do business with Russia and hoped it could “soften” Moscow’s position. The envoys again asked Ukraine to stop striking Russian refineries. Ukrainian officials made no formal commitment but indicated they could support a reciprocal energy ceasefire if Russia did the same. The account is consequential but remains based largely on unnamed sources. The White House has not published a meeting record, the diesel agreement, a peace-framework document or evidence that Russia made a concession in exchange for the arrangement. Reuters also reported that the Americans did not threaten in that meeting to cut military or intelligence support if Kyiv refused—a distinction from a separate Financial Times report that Reuters previously said it could not independently verify. LATEST UPDATE — October 12, 2026, 7:21 a.m. ET: Russian President Vladimir Putin would be prepared to halt Russian attacks on Ukraine only during the day of a Ukrainian presidential election, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said, according to Russia’s state-run RIA news agency. The limited offer followed the Kremlin’s rejection of President Volodymyr Zelenskyy’s request for a 60-day ceasefire to organize and conduct an election. No election date, written terms, monitoring mechanism or Ukrainian acceptance was announced. DINA therefore treats Peskov’s statement as a unilateral Russian proposal—not an operative ceasefire. LATEST UPDATE — October 12, 2026, 6:18 a.m. ET: European Union foreign ministers adopted nearly 1,600 new sanctions listings focused on Russia’s military-industrial complex. EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas called it the bloc’s largest expansion of its sanctions list since Russia began its full-scale invasion of Ukraine. More than half of the new listings are connected to the production chain for ballistic missiles, according to Kallas. Reuters reported that the package includes missile research and testing organizations, producers of solid fuel and rocket engines for the Iskander system, specialized-material suppliers, drone makers, submarine-service shipyards and 77 Russian politicians who ran in occupied Ukrainian territory. Separately, the Kremlin rejected Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy’s proposal for a 60-day ceasefire to permit a presidential election. Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said Russia wants a long-term peace agreement rather than a temporary pause. The statement is Russia’s position; it is not evidence that Moscow has accepted terms for a broader peace agreement. LATEST UPDATE — October 11, 2026, 8:18 p.m. ET: Seven U.S. senators—four Republicans and three Democrats—called on President Donald Trump to reverse his Russian-diesel arrangement, alleging that it conflicts with federal law barring Russian energy imports while Russia continues its war against Ukraine. The senators said the administration also failed to consult Congress or submit a legally required explanation. The group includes North Carolina Republican Thom Tillis, who separately told NBC that there is a “legitimate case” that the president is not following the law. Those are congressional legal allegations, not a court ruling. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent disputed that reading. He said the administration would use existing legal authority and argued that lawmakers who say the arrangement is prohibited are wrong. The White House and Treasury have not published the legal memorandum, waiver or sanctions license that would resolve the dispute in the public record. LATEST UPDATE — October 11, 2026, 3:54 p.m. ET: Russian attacks killed six people in two Ukrainian cities, according to Ukrainian officials cited by Reuters. A strike on a grocery store in the Kharkiv area killed three people and injured 20, including two children, regional governor Oleh Syniehubov said. Officials reported three additional deaths in a separate attack in western Ukraine. Reuters published images showing emergency crews among heavily damaged buildings and burned vehicles. DINA has not independently authenticated the strike locations, casualty totals, munition evidence or intended targets. Russia had not publicly responded to the reported casualties or confirmed Trump's claimed ceasefire as of this update. The attacks show that the wider war remains active after Trump's announcement. They do not, by themselves, establish a violation of an “energy ceasefire”: no common terms have been published, and the reported grocery-store strike was not identified as an attack on energy infrastructure. That distinction is essential even as the new civilian toll deepens the urgency for verifiable terms. LATEST UPDATE — October 11, 2026, 2:37 p.m. ET: Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said Russian forces continued attacking Ukrainian energy targets after President Donald Trump announced an immediate “energy ceasefire.” Zelenskyy said a strike hit a combined heat-and-power plant in Kharkiv and that Russian attack drones remained in the sky. Ukraine supports a reciprocal halt but is still waiting for details from the United States, Zelenskyy said. Russia had not publicly responded to Trump's announcement as of this update. The continuing attacks and absence of matching Russian assent mean DINA cannot verify that a ceasefire exists or has taken effect. Separately, Reuters reported that the Financial Times, citing European officials, said the United States threatened to cut intelligence sharing and the mechanism used to buy U.S. weapons for Ukraine unless Kyiv stopped deep strikes on Russian energy infrastructure. Reuters said it could not independently verify that report, and the White House did not immediately comment. DINA therefore treats the reported threat as an allegation requiring official records or on-the-record confirmation. LATEST UPDATE — October 11, 2026, 11:42 a.m. ET: President Donald Trump announced on social media that Russia and Ukraine had agreed to an immediate “energy ceasefire.” He did not publish terms, define the facilities or weapons covered, identify a monitoring body or explain how violations would be determined. Reuters reported no immediate confirmation from Kyiv or Moscow. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy told Axios that Trump's post was the first he had heard of such an agreement. A senior Ukrainian official told Reuters that Ukraine was ready to accept an energy ceasefire if Russia also agreed. Those statements indicate conditional Ukrainian willingness; they do not independently establish a bilateral agreement already in force. DINA is therefore treating Trump's announcement as a presidential claim—not as a confirmed ceasefire. The decisive evidence would be matching public commitments from Kyiv and Moscow, written scope, start time, duration, attribution rules, monitoring and enforcement. LATEST UPDATE — October 11, 2026: Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said Ukraine is prepared to stop attacking Russian oil refineries if Russia halts strikes on Ukrainian energy infrastructure. He said any de-escalation must be reciprocal and backed by real guarantees. No Russian acceptance, negotiating text, monitoring system or enforcement mechanism was announced. Zelenskyy's statement is a conditional Ukrainian proposal, not a ceasefire or an agreement already in effect. Zelenskyy also said Ukraine's official death toll from Saturday's Russian attack on Zaporizhzhia had risen to 23, including four children. DINA has not independently verified the casualty count, the munition, the intended target or the full circumstances of each death. He said consultations with European leaders would continue Sunday and that talks were underway over additional air-defense packages, including ammunition for combat aircraft. No complete package, delivery schedule or funding record was published with the statement. WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump called for Ukraine to replace President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and demanded that Kyiv stop striking Russian refineries, one day after Trump announced a Russian-diesel agreement that lifted U.S. sanctions on those exports. Trump blamed Ukrainian strikes on Russian energy infrastructure for pressure on global diesel supplies. The intervention came after Russian aerial bombs killed at least 20 people, including three children, in residential buildings in Zaporizhzhia, according to Ukrainian authorities. Zelenskyy argued that easing pressure on Russian diesel emboldened Moscow and would provide revenue for weapons and recruitment. That is Ukraine's stated judgment; the temporal sequence does not independently prove that the U.S. decision caused the Zaporizhzhia attack. What is confirmed Expanded October 14 toll: Zelenskyy said three people were killed in Kyiv, 30 energy facilities were damaged and at least 600,000 people lost electricity. Low reported interception count: Ukraine said it downed four of 39 incoming missiles. DINA has not independently verified those military figures. Russian acknowledgment: Russia's Defense Ministry said its forces struck four power plants in and around Kyiv and two in Kharkiv. Rail network affected: Ukraine's prime minister said state railway facilities were targeted in five regions. No jointly documented ceasefire: neither Russia nor Ukraine has published matching assent, common terms, a monitor or an enforcement process for the energy pause Trump announced. Expanded Senate opposition: Reuters reviewed an October 13 letter signed by 12 senators—six from each party—urging Trump to rescind the diesel arrangement and revoke General License 135. North Carolina connection: Republican Sen. Thom Tillis signed both the earlier seven-senator statement and the new 12-senator letter. Operative authorization: OFAC General License 135 authorizes covered Russian-origin diesel transactions, including U.S. importation, through April 7, 2027. No legal judgment: the senators' claim that the arrangement conflicts with federal law has not been adjudicated. Trump's public position: Trump said intelligence sharing with Ukraine continues and described the diesel as intended for the world market; he did not answer whether proceeds could finance additional Russian attacks. First reported energy-target pause: Russia's October 13 daily strike report did not list Ukrainian energy facilities, and Reuters reported no Russian energy target was hit Tuesday. Intent remains unknown: a missile landed just over one kilometer from a major Lviv heating plant, and no public evidence establishes that Moscow deliberately observed a ceasefire. Ukrainian restraint: Zelenskyy said Ukraine had not attacked Russian refineries for two days. Wider attacks continued: Ukrainian officials reported four people killed in Kharkiv and damage at transport, logistics, residential and medical sites. Warning gap under review: Ukraine's air force said it received no advance surveillance warning before six ballistic missiles were launched at Kyiv; Sybiha said U.S. intelligence sharing continues. No Russian assent published: the Kremlin said contacts were ongoing but did not announce acceptance of Trump's claimed ceasefire or release common terms. Trump's direct statement: Trump said the parties agreed because he said they agreed. Reuters and the Associated Press reported the exchange. Unsupported violation claim: Trump said both sides had violated the ceasefire but identified no event or evidence supporting his attribution. No matching assent: Ukraine has expressed conditional willingness to stop energy attacks if Russia reciprocates. The Kremlin says discussions continue and has not published acceptance of Trump's claimed agreement. Continuing strikes: Ukraine reported at least six Russian attacks on energy targets and said it conducted no refinery attacks overnight. These are Ukrainian claims; DINA has not independently authenticated every incident. Commander's reported role: a Ukrainian security adviser and a Western official told The Washington Post that Grynkewich conveyed Washington's request for Ukraine to halt refinery strikes. Neither source was named. Kyiv's interpretation: the Ukrainian adviser said Kyiv understood references to American weapons and intelligence as a possible cutoff warning. The same adviser said U.S. officials characterized the communication as a partner request, not a threat. No disclosed cutoff: NATO said PURL assistance continues. DINA found no public order suspending weapons, intelligence sharing or PURL deliveries over the refinery campaign. Public NATO position: Grynkewich said the alliance is prepared to counter an attack, called for increased European support for Ukraine and said war with NATO is not imminent or inevitable. Reported U.S. rationale: three people familiar with a Miami meeting told Reuters that U.S. envoys described the diesel arrangement as an attempt to draw Russia back to negotiations and “soften” Moscow’s position. Putin assessment: two sources said the envoys told Ukrainian officials that Putin was not prepared to negotiate an end to the war. Request to Kyiv: the Americans again asked Ukraine to halt refinery strikes, according to Reuters. Ukrainian officials did not agree formally but signaled openness to reciprocal restraint. No support cutoff reported in this meeting: Reuters’ sources said the envoys did not threaten to withhold U.S. military or intelligence support during the Miami discussion. Public-record gap: no official transcript, diesel contract, sanctions instrument or Russian concession tied to the arrangement has been released. One-day Russian proposal: Peskov said Putin would halt attacks during Ukraine’s presidential-election day, according to RIA and Reuters. No agreement: Ukraine did not announce acceptance, and no election date, security plan, scope or verification system was published. EU adoption: EU foreign ministers adopted nearly 1,600 new sanctions listings targeting Russia’s military-industrial complex on October 12. Missile-production focus: Kallas said more than half of the listings are connected to ballistic-missile production chains. Reuters previously reported the exact envoy-approved total as 1,646 designations. Ceasefire rejected: the Kremlin rejected Zelenskyy’s proposal for a 60-day total ceasefire that Ukraine says would permit a presidential election under wartime conditions. No broader deal published: Peskov said Russia wants long-term peace, but Moscow did not publish or accept a comprehensive settlement with verifiable terms. Bipartisan challenge: Republican Sens. Susan Collins, Lisa Murkowski, Thom Tillis and John Curtis joined Democratic Sens. Jeanne Shaheen, Richard Blumenthal and Ron Wyden in calling for the deal to be reversed. Legal allegation: the senators said the arrangement violates the 2022 ban on Russian energy imports and that the administration did not provide Congress the consultation and explanation they say the law requires. No court has ruled on that claim. Administration response: Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said existing legal authority permits the arrangement. The administration has not publicly released the operative legal analysis or sanctions instrument. Six reported killed: Ukrainian officials said Russian attacks killed three people at a grocery store in the Kharkiv area and three people in a separate western Ukrainian city. Twenty reported injured: Kharkiv regional governor Oleh Syniehubov said 20 people, including two children, were injured. Earlier official counts were lower, showing that casualty figures were still changing. No automatic ceasefire finding: The reported attacks confirm continuing hostilities, but DINA cannot call the grocery-store strike a breach of an energy-only ceasefire whose scope and assent have never been published. Attacks continued: Zelenskyy said Russia struck a heat-and-power plant in Kharkiv and continued drone and aerial-bomb attacks after Trump's ceasefire announcement. This is an official Ukrainian account; DINA has not independently verified the strike evidence. Ukraine still awaits terms: Zelenskyy said Kyiv supports an energy ceasefire but is waiting for details from Washington. No Russian response: Reuters reported no public Russian reaction to Trump's announcement as of 2:37 p.m. ET. Reported U.S. pressure: The Financial Times, citing European officials, reported that Washington threatened intelligence sharing and weapons procurement support to press Kyiv to stop refinery strikes. Reuters could not independently verify the report; the White House did not immediately comment. Trump's new claim: the U.S. president said Russia and Ukraine had agreed to an immediate “energy ceasefire,” but released no terms or verification mechanism. No bilateral confirmation: Reuters reported no immediate confirmation from Kyiv or Moscow. Zelenskyy said Trump's post was the first he had heard of the claimed agreement. Conditional Ukrainian position: a senior Ukrainian official told Reuters that Kyiv was prepared to agree if Russia did the same. Conditional readiness is not proof of Russian acceptance. Conditional Ukrainian proposal: Zelenskyy said Ukraine would halt refinery strikes if Russia stops attacks on Ukrainian energy infrastructure, with reciprocity and guarantees. No agreement yet: Russia had not publicly accepted the proposal, and no written terms, monitoring body or enforcement mechanism was announced. Updated Zaporizhzhia toll: Zelenskyy said 23 people, including four children, were killed. This is an official Ukrainian count and has not been independently verified by DINA. Air-defense talks: Zelenskyy said discussions continue with European leaders over additional packages and combat-aircraft ammunition; full terms remain unpublished. Trump's statement: He said it was time for Ukraine to get a new president and demanded an end to Ukrainian refinery attacks. Diesel agreement: Trump announced immediate Russian deliveries exceeding 300,000 tons, followed by additional volumes. Russia said it partially lifted its diesel-export ban. Earlier Zaporizhzhia count: Ukrainian authorities initially reported at least 20 deaths, including three children, and at least 18 injuries; the later official toll supersedes that count. Political disagreement: Zelenskyy and European governments said Russian energy revenue can fund the war; Trump said imports were needed to lower prices. Unresolved: delivery capacity, sanctions mechanism, payment terms and measurable effect on U.S. diesel prices. Why it matters A day without a reported strike on energy infrastructure is a potentially important reduction in one category of attack, especially as winter approaches. But the distinction between observed conduct and an agreed ceasefire remains essential: one day of restraint cannot prove intent, durability, reciprocity or enforceable rules. The six ballistic missiles fired at Kyiv and Ukraine's statement that no advance warning arrived also put U.S. intelligence support under scrutiny. Sybiha's statement that sharing continues prevents a factual claim that Washington cut off intelligence, but it does not explain why this specific warning was absent. The president's statement removes ambiguity about why the White House used the language of agreement without matching confirmation from the belligerents: Trump treated his declaration as sufficient. That is not the same diplomatic or evidentiary standard as mutual assent, and it leaves civilians, military commanders and energy operators without verifiable rules. His assertion of violations by both sides introduces a further accountability problem. Assigning blame without identifying the alleged incidents or publishing evidence can create false equivalence between documented Ukrainian restraint and reported Russian strikes, while making it impossible for the public to evaluate compliance. The new reporting connects the refinery request to the commander who helps identify U.S. equipment packages for Ukraine under PURL. That makes the distinction between a request and a condition consequential: even without a formal cutoff order, a reminder about essential support from the official who helps shape that pipeline could carry coercive weight in Kyiv. The public and private messages also expose a policy tension. Grynkewich publicly describes Russia as a continuing threat that should be met with stronger support for Ukraine, while anonymous sources say he delivered Washington's request for Ukrainian restraint against infrastructure sustaining Russia's fuel supply. The administration has not explained how those positions fit into one allied strategy or what reciprocal restraint it secured from Moscow. The reported private explanation exposes a central policy tradeoff: Washington appears to be giving Russia an economic opening in hopes of changing Putin’s negotiating posture while its own envoys reportedly assess that he is not ready to end the war. That makes the timing, legal authority and measurable return for the concession matters of public accountability. The meeting account also narrows—but does not eliminate—the dispute over alleged U.S. coercion. Reuters’ sources say no cutoff threat was made in Miami, while an earlier Financial Times report alleged broader pressure involving intelligence and weapons support. Without official records, the public cannot determine whether the accounts describe different meetings, different policy options or conflicting recollections. A one-day pause does not resolve the security, registration, campaigning, observation and displaced-voter problems involved in a national wartime election. The gap between Kyiv’s requested 60 days and Moscow’s proposed election-day-only pause shows that the parties remain far apart even on the preconditions for a vote. The EU action converts last week’s diplomatic agreement into a formal political decision and targets the industrial network behind weapons Ukraine has struggled to intercept. A sanctions listing freezes assets under EU jurisdiction and restricts access to the bloc, but its military effect will depend on enforcement, ownership tracing and whether components continue moving through intermediary countries. Moscow’s rejection of a time-limited ceasefire exposes the central contradiction in the election dispute. Russian officials have challenged Zelenskyy’s legitimacy because Ukraine has not held a wartime vote, while Ukrainian law prohibits elections during martial law and the Kremlin has declined the pause Kyiv says is necessary to organize one safely. The dispute has moved from political criticism to a specific bipartisan challenge over statutory authority and congressional notice. Because the dissenters include four members of the president's party—and North Carolina's senior senator—the administration now faces a concrete demand to identify the law, waiver and sanctions mechanism it is relying on. The reported deaths underscore the human cost of announcing a ceasefire before the belligerents publish matching commitments. Civilians cannot rely on a social-media declaration for protection, and governments cannot credibly determine compliance without a defined scope, start time and monitoring process. The first reported events after Trump's announcement cut directly against the claim that a verified ceasefire was “effective immediately.” A Ukrainian allegation of a new Russian strike does not, by itself, prove which party violated what terms—because no common terms have been published—but it shows why the distinction between a diplomatic claim and an operational agreement matters. If Russia and Ukraine later confirm matching terms, an energy ceasefire could reduce attacks on power systems and fuel infrastructure that have harmed civilians, strained Ukraine's grid and affected energy markets. Until then, describing the announcement as an operative ceasefire risks creating false certainty during an active war. The proposal is the first publicly stated reciprocal formula in this dispute: refinery strikes would stop only if attacks on Ukraine's energy system also stop. If accepted and independently monitored, it could reduce civilian hardship and pressure on fuel markets. Without definitions, verification and consequences for violations, however, each side could accuse the other of breaking an arrangement that does not yet exist. A U.S. president calling for replacement of a wartime allied leader is an extraordinary intervention in another country's democratic politics. It also asks Ukraine to stop attacks on infrastructure that produces Russian export revenue while Washington loosens sanctions intended to limit that revenue. Reuters reported analysts doubt the announced volumes will produce sustained price relief. AP noted Trump signed a broad Russia-sanctions law only last month, making the legal path and any waiver or license central accountability questions. DINA analysis: elections and energy cannot replace a peace framework DINA analysis: The wider Senate coalition raises the political cost of leaving General License 135 unexplained, but the accountability issue is documentary rather than rhetorical. The administration should publish its statutory analysis of the license, the consultation record Congress says was required, the expected price effect and the Russian commitments—if any—obtained in return. Congress should identify whether it will seek judicial review, use appropriations restrictions or vote on a targeted revocation rather than leaving the dispute at the level of letters. DINA analysis: Trump's assurance that intelligence sharing continues narrows one factual question but does not resolve whether specific warnings, weapons channels or future assistance were conditioned on Ukrainian restraint. Nor does saying the diesel is for the world market answer whether authorized sales generate revenue available to the Russian state or war economy. DINA analysis: The first observable pause should be tested, not declared a diplomatic success. Washington, Kyiv and Moscow should publish time-stamped commitments, the facilities covered and monitoring data. If similar restraint continues for several days, that would be stronger evidence of de-escalation; if it does not, Tuesday may prove to have been coincidence rather than compliance. DINA analysis: Congress should separately determine whether the missing Kyiv warning resulted from a collection gap, transmission failure, operational decision or policy restriction. The public record presently supports investigation—not an allegation that U.S. intelligence was intentionally withheld. DINA analysis: A president can propose, broker or announce a ceasefire, but he cannot create mutual assent by assertion. The administration should release the communications it believes constitute acceptance from Kyiv and Moscow; absent that record, DINA will continue describing the arrangement as a U.S. claim rather than an operative bilateral agreement. DINA analysis: The “both sides” allegation should not be repeated as fact without incident-level evidence. The White House should identify each alleged violation, the target, time, weapon, source of attribution and the agreed rule it says was breached. DINA analysis: A formal threat and a warning perceived through diplomatic context are not the same claim. The responsible way to resolve the discrepancy is documentary: Congress should obtain the directives sent to U.S. and NATO commanders, the talking points used with Kyiv and any record tying intelligence, weapons or PURL deliveries to Ukrainian restraint. DINA analysis: If Washington is asking Ukraine to stop a campaign that has imposed costs on Russia, it should state what reciprocal Russian action it requires and how compliance will be verified. Restraint imposed on only one belligerent would reduce pressure on Moscow without protecting Ukrainian energy facilities or civilians. DINA analysis: Using a commercial concession as diplomatic leverage is not inherently improper, but the sequence matters. If sanctions relief arrives before a verifiable Russian commitment, Moscow receives the benefit while Washington retains only the hope that Putin’s position will soften. The administration should define the benchmark that would make the arrangement successful and the consequence if Russia continues attacking while declining serious negotiations. DINA analysis: Anonymous-source reporting can reveal important decision-making, but it cannot substitute for governing records. Congress should seek the Miami meeting memorandum, the legal authority for Russian fuel access, any communications tying the arrangement to peace talks and the intelligence assessment behind the envoys’ reported conclusion that Putin is not ready to end the war. DINA analysis: A single day without attacks would not create a credible nationwide election environment by itself. Russia and Ukraine would need enforceable rules covering civilian security, military operations, campaigning, media access, international observation and voting by soldiers and displaced citizens well before ballots are cast. DINA analysis: The sanctions package is a substantial attempt to raise the cost of Russian missile production, but the number of listings is not itself a measure of success. The EU should publish the full legal acts, identify beneficial ownership and intermediaries, and report enforcement outcomes so the public can distinguish announced designations from assets actually frozen or supply channels disrupted. DINA analysis: Russia cannot credibly use the absence of a Ukrainian election as a legitimacy argument while rejecting the temporary ceasefire Ukraine says it needs to hold that election. Kyiv, for its part, should publish a detailed election-security plan explaining how displaced voters, soldiers and residents of occupied territories would participate if a ceasefire were reached. DINA analysis: Competing assertions from senators and the Treasury secretary do not settle legality. The accountable next step is document disclosure: the administration should release the operative authorization, its interpretation of the 2022 import ban, the congressional consultation record and any explanation submitted under the statute. Until then, DINA describes the deal as legally contested—not established as lawful or unlawful. DINA analysis: A ceasefire cannot be verified by one leader's social-media post alone. The Trump administration should publish the diplomatic record showing assent by both parties, while Kyiv and Moscow should state their positions directly. Absent that evidence, news organizations and markets should treat the announcement as an unconfirmed claim. DINA analysis: The grocery-store casualties should not be rhetorically folded into an “energy ceasefire violation” without evidence that the site, weapon or operation fell within agreed terms. The stronger accountability finding is more basic: Washington announced an agreement that neither belligerent had jointly documented while lethal attacks continued. DINA analysis: If the reported threat to suspend intelligence or weapons procurement is accurate, Congress and allied governments need to know whether U.S. security assistance is being conditioned on unilateral Ukrainian restraint while Russian attacks continue. That policy choice should be disclosed and debated rather than executed through private pressure that the administration will not acknowledge. DINA analysis: Zelenskyy's conditional offer gives Washington and European governments a testable diplomatic opening. The essential questions are what counts as energy infrastructure, when a pause begins, how attacks are attributed, who monitors compliance and what happens after a violation. A public slogan about mutual restraint is not a substitute for written terms and credible verification. DINA analysis: Trump may criticize Zelenskyy's strategy, but demanding a new Ukrainian president without identifying a constitutional, electoral or peace-process mechanism risks turning U.S. economic leverage into pressure on Ukraine's political leadership. The administration should publish the diesel agreement, its sanctions authority and the evidence behind its price claims. The strongest policy question is whether the arrangement trades away sanctions leverage before Russia makes a verifiable concession. Ukraine's refinery campaign carries economic and escalation risks, but those risks should be debated through a transparent allied strategy—not reduced to personal blame for U.S. pump prices. Urgent follow-up Request the complete White House and State Department proposal, meeting readouts, participant lists and legal analysis for resuming Russian gas transit through Ukraine. Identify the proposed U.S. intermediary, its beneficial owners, investor fees and conflicts of interest, and the escrow jurisdiction, trustee, release conditions and audit rights. Ask the European Commission and affected member states what provision of Regulation (EU) 2026/261 could lawfully permit the reported arrangement and whether any authorization request has been filed. Ask Ukraine, Naftogaz and the Gas Transmission System Operator of Ukraine whether they consent to renewed transit and request proposed volumes, fees, infrastructure terms and security guarantees. Ask Russia what reciprocal, monitorable commitment it would make, how violations would be attributed and whether proceeds would remain frozen after a breach. Obtain the incident-by-incident list of the 30 damaged energy facilities, outage maps, restoration estimates and casualty documentation, with security-sensitive details redacted. Request Ukraine's full air-defense accounting for the 39 missiles, including weapon types and reasons for the low interception total that can be disclosed without compromising defenses. Ask Russia to identify the six power plants it says it struck, the asserted military objective and how those attacks comport with any energy restraint discussed with Washington. Request from the White House the president's assessment of whether the acknowledged power-plant strikes violate the ceasefire he announced and what consequence follows. Obtain Kyiv's incident and casualty reports, geolocated damage imagery, energy-facility assessments and munition evidence from the October 14 strike. Ask Russia whether it struck the reported energy sites, what targets it identifies and whether it recognizes any prohibition covering those facilities. Ask the White House whether it considers the October 14 attack a breach of the arrangement Trump announced and request the evidence and agreed rule supporting that judgment. Obtain and publish the complete October 13 letter, its delivery record and any White House, Treasury or State Department response. Request Treasury's legal memorandum for General License 135, the required congressional consultation record and any analysis of the 2022 Russian-energy import ban. Ask each signatory whether Congress will pursue legislation, appropriations limits, oversight subpoenas or judicial review if the administration declines to revoke the license. Request Treasury's estimate of authorized transaction volumes, payment channels, Russian recipients and projected effect on U.S. wholesale and retail diesel prices. Request strike logs, satellite data and damage assessments needed to verify whether any Ukrainian energy facility was targeted or hit on October 13. Ask the Kremlin whether avoiding energy targets was intentional and whether Russia accepts any common start time, scope or monitoring process. Request the U.S. and Ukrainian reviews of why no advance warning preceded the six ballistic missiles launched at Kyiv. Demand the White House release the exact communications in which Russia and Ukraine allegedly accepted the same ceasefire terms. Request the incident list and evidence underlying Trump's assertion that both sides violated the arrangement. Ask the State Department to identify the start time, covered infrastructure, prohibited acts, attribution standard, monitor and consequences for breach. Request from U.S. European Command, NATO, the Pentagon and the National Security Council every directive, memorandum, talking point and readout concerning Ukrainian strikes on Russian refineries. Ask whether Grynkewich or any U.S. official expressly or implicitly linked intelligence sharing, U.S.-origin weapons or PURL deliveries to Ukrainian compliance, and identify the legal authority for any such condition. Obtain current PURL delivery schedules and interruption records so NATO's statement that support continues can be tested against actual shipments. Ask Washington what reciprocal Russian commitment, enforcement mechanism and consequence for noncompliance accompanied its request to Kyiv. Request the official memorandum, participant list and contemporaneous notes from the Miami meeting with Witkoff, Kushner, Ukrainian and European officials. Ask the White House to identify the specific Russian action expected in return for diesel-market access, the deadline for that action and what relief would be reversed if Moscow declines. Ask the State Department and National Security Council whether the reported assessment that Putin is not prepared to end the war reflects the administration’s current official judgment. Seek any written U.S. assurances that military and intelligence support will not be conditioned on unilateral Ukrainian restraint. Ask the Kremlin to publish the proposed election-day pause, including exact hours, covered weapons and forces, territorial scope, monitoring and consequences for violations. Ask Ukraine whether a one-day pause could satisfy any part of its election law, security planning or international-observer requirements. Obtain the final EU legal acts, annexes and complete list of newly designated people and entities, including effective dates and identifiers. Ask EU member states how many assets are frozen, which intermediaries are under investigation and how enforcement will address ownership changes and third-country procurement routes. Request the Kremlin’s proposed terms for the “long-term peace” Peskov invoked and ask whether Russia would accept any monitored pause for elections. Request from Ukraine a legal and operational election plan covering martial law, displaced voters, military personnel, occupied territory, observation and campaign security. Request the senators' complete statement, statutory citations and any correspondence sent to the White House, Treasury or State Department. Obtain Treasury's legal memorandum, sanctions license or waiver authorizing Russian diesel imports and the administration's record of consultation with Congress. Request from the White House the diplomatic record, written terms and time-stamped assent it says establish agreement by both Russia and Ukraine. Ask Kyiv and Moscow separately whether they accept the same scope, start time, duration, monitoring system and enforcement consequences. Track strikes against energy infrastructure after Trump's stated start time and distinguish independently verified incidents from belligerent claims. Obtain the official casualty lists, medical-facility counts, geolocated imagery and munition evidence for the Kharkiv-area grocery-store strike and the separate western Ukraine attack. Ask Russian authorities whether their forces conducted either strike, what targets they identify and whether they accept any limits announced by Washington. Request from Ukrainian authorities the Kharkiv plant location, damage assessment, casualty report, time of impact, imagery and munition evidence. Ask the White House and Pentagon whether intelligence sharing or the Prioritized Ukraine Requirements List procurement mechanism was threatened, by whom, under what legal authority and with what conditions. Ask Russia whether it accepts the reciprocal proposal and, if so, which facilities, weapons and geographic areas it would cover. Request a written Ukrainian proposal defining energy infrastructure, start time, duration, attribution rules, monitoring and consequences for violations. Ask the United States, European Union, United Nations and International Atomic Energy Agency what monitoring or good-offices role, if any, they could provide. Obtain the proposed European air-defense package list, delivery timetable, funding source and end-use safeguards. Publish the diesel agreement, delivery schedule, prices, payment channels and sanctions licenses. Ask what constitutional process the White House believes Ukraine should use to replace its president during martial law. Obtain Treasury's analysis reconciling the deal with the recent Russia-sanctions law. Request Energy Department modeling of the agreement's expected price effect. Verify the Zaporizhzhia casualty list, impact sites, munition evidence and any asserted military targets. Ask Russia what verifiable concession it made in exchange for sanctions relief. Related DINA coverage Zelenskyy Says 78 Killed in Two Days, Accuses U.S. of Inaction After Kramatorsk Strike (https://www.dinanews247.press/articles/kramatorsk-bus-strike-october-8) Ukraine Strike Toll Rises to at Least 32; 22 Killed in Pryluky (https://www.dinanews247.press/articles/russia-massive-strike-kyiv-two-killed-october-7) Sources The Wall Street Journal — U.S. pushes to restore Russian gas sales to Europe via Ukraine, November 2, 2026 (https://www.wsj.com/world/europe/u-s-pushes-to-restore-russian-gas-sales-to-europe-via-ukraine-0ca62dc7) Reuters — summary of the Wall Street Journal report; Reuters says it could not immediately verify it, November 2, 2026 (https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/us-pushes-restore-russian-gas-sales-europe-via-ukraine-wsj-reports-2026-11-02/) European Commission — October 28 press briefing on Nord Stream, sanctions and binding REPowerEU phaseout legislation (https://audiovisual.ec.europa.eu/en/video/I-296925) European Commission — REPowerEU phaseout of Russian energy imports and Regulation (EU) 2026/261 (https://energy.ec.europa.eu/strategy/repowereu-phase-out-russian-energy-imports_en) Reuters — Russian strikes kill three, damage 30 energy facilities and leave at least 600,000 without power; Ukraine reports four of 39 missiles intercepted, October 14, 2026 (https://www.reuters.com/world/russian-strikes-kill-one-hit-energy-facilities-kyiv-mayor-says-2026-10-14/) Ukrinform — Kyiv police report three killed and 27 injured in the combined attack, October 14, 2026 (https://www.ukrinform.net/rubric-ato/4174182-russian-combined-attack-on-kyiv-kills-three-injures-27.html) Reuters — Russian attack on Kyiv kills one and hits energy facilities, mayor says, October 14, 2026 (https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/russian-attack-kyiv-kills-one-hits-energy-facilities-mayor-says-2026-10-14/) U.S. Treasury Office of Foreign Assets Control — General License 135, dated October 9, 2026 (https://ofac.treasury.gov/media/937216/download?inline=) Reuters — 12 senators urge Trump to rescind the Russian-diesel arrangement, October 13, 2026 (https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/gift-our-adversary-more-republicans-balk-trumps-russia-diesel-deal-2026-10-13/) Reuters — Trump says intelligence sharing continues and defends the diesel arrangement, October 13, 2026 (https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/trump-says-us-still-sharing-intel-with-ukraine-defends-russian-diesel-deal-2026-10-13/) Reuters — no Russian energy target reported hit Tuesday; Ukraine says refinery strikes paused; wider attacks continue, October 13, 2026 (https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/russia-hits-no-energy-targets-ukraine-first-time-since-trumps-truce-2026-10-13/) Reuters — Trump says the parties agreed because he said they agreed and defends the Russian-diesel arrangement, October 12, 2026 (https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/trump-defends-russia-diesel-deal-lawmakers-both-parties-complain-2026-10-12/) Associated Press — Trump alleges violations by both sides as Ukraine reports Russian strikes and no overnight refinery attacks, October 12, 2026 (https://apnews.com/article/6fdef6ff4d033b379c74e1d62183d078) The Washington Post — anonymous Ukrainian and Western officials say Grynkewich conveyed Washington's refinery-strike request; NATO says PURL support continues, October 12, 2026 (https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2026/10/12/top-us-general-vows-thwart-russia-he-warns-kyiv-stop-attacks/) Associated Press — Grynkewich's public Warsaw remarks on NATO readiness and support for Ukraine, October 12, 2026 (https://apnews.com/article/russia-nato-moscow-warsaw-grynkewich-speech-security-35f686aaeeee60e5bb315c5ecf7309c5) NATO — PURL structure, funding and delivery status (https://www.nato.int/en/what-we-do/partnerships-and-cooperation/relations-with-ukraine) Reuters — U.S. envoys describe Russian-diesel arrangement as an effort to draw Moscow back to talks; sources say Putin was not prepared to end the war, October 12, 2026 (https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/us-hopes-diesel-deal-can-soften-moscow-peace-talks-sources-say-2026-10-12/) Reuters — Peskov says Putin would halt attacks only during Ukraine’s presidential-election day, October 12, 2026 (https://www.reuters.com/world/putin-is-ready-stop-attacks-ukraine-only-election-day-ria-reports-2026-10-12/) EU NEIGHBOURS east — EU foreign ministers adopt the bloc’s largest sanctions-list expansion since Russia’s full-scale invasion, October 12, 2026 (https://euneighbourseast.eu/news/latest-news/russia-war-against-ukraine-eu-adopts-22nd-package-of-sanctions/) Reuters — EU adopts nearly 1,600 new Russia sanctions listings, October 12, 2026 (https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/eu-adopts-nearly-1600-new-sanctions-listings-targeting-russia-2026-10-12/) Reuters — scope of the 1,646 envoy-approved designations, October 7, 2026 (https://www.reuters.com/business/aerospace-defense/eu-envoys-approve-new-russia-sanctions-listings-diplomats-say-2026-10-07/) Reuters — Kremlin rejects Zelenskyy’s 60-day ceasefire proposal, October 12, 2026 (https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/kremlin-rejects-ukrainian-leaders-idea-60-day-ceasefire-says-it-wants-an-overall-2026-10-12/) Reuters — seven Republican and Democratic senators challenge the Russian-diesel arrangement; Treasury responds, October 11, 2026 (https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/prominent-republican-senator-says-trumps-russian-diesel-deal-may-be-illegal-2026-10-11/) Oleh Syniehubov, head of the Kharkiv Regional Military Administration — official Telegram channel (https://t.me/s/synegubov) Reuters — Ukrainian officials report six killed in attacks on two cities, October 11, 2026 (https://www.reuters.com/world/russian-attacks-kill-six-people-two-ukrainian-cities-2026-10-11/) Office of the President of Ukraine — Zelenskyy's address on reciprocal restraint and continuing Russian attacks, October 11, 2026 (https://www.president.gov.ua/en/videos/ukrayina-gotova-ne-zavdavati-udariv-po-rosijskij-energetici-8933) Reuters — Zelenskyy says Russian attacks continued and Ukraine still awaits U.S. ceasefire details, October 11, 2026 (https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/ukraine-awaits-details-ceasefire-proposals-us-russia-maintains-attacks-zelenskiy-2026-10-11/) Reuters — Financial Times reports U.S. pressure threat; Reuters could not independently verify it, October 11, 2026 (https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/us-threatens-block-arms-ukraine-over-refinery-attacks-ft-reports-2026-10-11/) Reuters — Trump announces an immediate “energy ceasefire”; no immediate confirmation from Kyiv or Moscow, October 11, 2026 (https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/trump-says-russia-ukraine-reached-energy-ceasefire-2026-10-11/) Reuters — Zelenskyy's reciprocal energy-strike proposal, updated Zaporizhzhia toll and air-defense discussions, October 11, 2026 (https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/ukraine-will-halt-strikes-refineries-if-russia-stops-energy-attacks-zelenskiy-2026-10-11/) Reuters — Trump statement, Zaporizhzhia toll, diesel agreement and diplomatic response, October 10, 2026 (https://www.reuters.com/business/aerospace-defense/russian-attack-ukraines-zaporizhzhia-kills-seven-governor-says-2026-10-10/) Associated Press — diesel volumes, sanctions context and European response, October 10, 2026 (https://apnews.com/article/russia-ukraine-war-trump-putin-diesel-228ccf74b2848c1ff0ac23f038b37512) REPUBLICATION NOTICE Original DINA-authored text may be republished without charge under the terms at https://www.dinanews247.press/syndication#terms. Third-party material and images require separate permission. SOCIAL POST Report: U.S. Pushes Russian Gas Transit Through Ukraine Despite EU Phaseout Law The reported U.S. plan could use an American intermediary and escrow Russian proceeds as leverage for an energy ceasefire. Reuters could not verify the report, and no government has published an agreement. Breaking News · Russia–Ukraine War · U.S. Foreign Policy · Energy · Democratic Accountability By Kirk Ramsey, IIII DINA Co-Editor Democracy Independent News Association (DINA) Read the full report and sources: https://www.dinanews247.press/articles/trump-calls-replace-zelenskyy-russian-diesel-october-10 #DINA #PublicAccountability